Why now, in 2017, is suddenly religious intolerance a big social issue, a cause celeb?
This is the principle behind the anti-Islamophobia (so-called) outcry in the West, in Canada and the U.S. is it not?
Where was this righteousness in the mainstream a few years ago when it was trendy to slam Chritianity on a daily basis in pop culture, and actually still is?
Is eliminating religious intolerance really the motive here? Or is this just a means to an end?
Will Christians who grew up in the west listening to abuse, derision and daily hatred, as well as watch sacrilege enshrined as art in pop culture realize that they are being had by another agenda?
When will the self-loathing of the Europeans and their descendents everywhere ever be satiated?
Will generation Z finally be the group that says enough is enough?
And another question, is the media censorship bill pending in Canada have any bearing on the recent Trudeau vacation with George Soros? That man is capable of orchestrating anything.
Trudeau is a babe in the woods when messing with an old Nazi collaborator like Soros. He is capable of anything. His foundations supported 49 of the 51 groups licensed by Washington DC to protest the inaugeration.
It is not yet clear who was funding the rioters at Berkeley.
Some simple sleuthing online tells the story about the so-called “Muslim Ban.” The list of nations was determined by Homeland Security in 2015 and basically cut-and-pasted into Trumps’s executive order. It had nothing to do with religion other than by obvious extension to the motivation of ISIS and their ilk, and it had nothing to do with where Trump’s business empire did business.
Now that is fabrication on the part of some MSM news organizations and laziness on the part of others based on a narrative already written.
Surprise surprise, the BBC actually covered this with balance. Kudo’s to them.
On another note, one of the latest crisis stories on Facebook is Trump’s appointment of Bannon to head national security and demoting the DNI and Chairman of the joint chiefs. The post calls Bannon a white supremicist. That finished it for me, because I have studied that claim when it was first made. It isn’t true. He is an American nationalist. Massive difference. That taints anything else in the story.
Perhaps those people missed it but Trump, before inaugeration, did a little test because everything that went on in his National Security briefings, even the fact that he had one, was leaked to the press. He didn’t tell anyone about a particular meeting, not even his own personal secretary, but lo and behold the press discovered it.
No wonder he doesn’t trust those people, now more than ever when the meetings he is going to have discuss policy, not just updating information. What will happen now is that he will get real info from them because they cannot second-guess policy and tailor their reports, as happened in the past, under Bush and Obama.
Thus the U.S. MSM narrative perpetuated. Their hatred of Trump knows no bounds and neither does their capacity to outright lie and mischaracterize him and his actions.
Goes to show that feminism today is not about equality or freedom or anything remotely of the kind. It is all about someone else’s agenda, that being world government and the end of free people. They are pawns allying themselves with the worst of the world’s oppressors of women in their blind hatred of Trump.
The sad part is that they will reap the rewards of that alliance, and even sadder is that many innocent women will suffer as a result as well.
It’s a bit long, about 3 hrs and despite being held as a Senate Democrat hearing it is remarkably balanced. I believe Trump has his own sources that tell him there is an internal battle in the CIA and other intelligence agencies and that there is a faction that is anti-Trump and particularly anti-Putin and come from the same neo-con war mongering line of thinking that characterized the Cheney group under G.W. Bush.
The problem highlighted in this hearing has not been rectified, although they are serving a different master with the same globalist agenda.